The Approach of Advisory Bodies to Evaluating Iran’s World Heritage Nomination Dossiers

Document Type : Original

Authors

1 Ph.D., Architectural Conservation, School of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran

2 Associate Professor, School of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran

Abstract

The formal advisory bodies of the World Heritage Committee (ICOMOS and IUCN) evaluate all the nominations of properties for inscription on the World Heritage List. These evaluations help the World Heritage Committee to decide which properties to inscribe on the world heritage list. However, it is the World Heritage Committee that makes the final decision, which can be contrary to the recommendations of the advisory bodies. Therefore, there may be many properties on the list that have not necessarily been approved by the advisory bodies. The review and technical evaluations carried out by the advisory bodies can reveal deficiencies in the nomination dossiers, which may be overshadowed by the committee’s decisions. Nevertheless, understanding the approach of these bodies and their evaluation methods can be taken into consideration in the preparation of nomination files and avoid heavy costs in the process. The following research offers a review of the Iranian cultural and natural property nominations for inscription on the World Heritage List and analyzes the issues and deficiencies of these nomination files through the lens of the advisory bodies. To carry out this research, all the evaluation reports of the advisory bodies regarding Iran’s World Heritage nomination dossiers have been analyzed using qualitative content analysis. This study found that the main focus ofICOMOS lies on the “justification” section, while IUCN mostly concentrates on “justification” and “management” sections. The review also shows that the main challenges in the evaluation stage are due to a lack of mutual understanding between the nominating State Party and the advisory bodies. In general, the advisory bodies consider the most important issues in Iran’s WH nomination dossiers to be the information provided in the sections of justification (Outstanding Universal Values), conservation, and comparative analysis.

Keywords

References

قاسمی، حمید و دیگران.1400. مرجع پژوهش. تهران: اندیشه آرا.
راجردی،ویمر، و جوزف آر دومنیک.1384. تحقیق در رسانه‌های جمعی. ترجمۀ کاووس سیدامامی. تهران: سروش.
Bertacchini, E., C.Liuzza, L.Meskell, andD.Saccone. 2016. The politicization of UNESCO World Heritage decision making. Public Choice 167(1–2): 95–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-016-0332-9
ICOMOS. (n.d.). The evaluation process in detail - International Council on Monuments and Sites. Retrieved June 10, 2022, from https://www.icomos.org/en/our-work/evaluation/the-evaluation-process-in-detail
ICOMOS. 2003. Evaluations of cultural properties. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2009/whc09-33com-inf8B1ADDe.pdf
ICOMOS. 2004. Evaluations of cultural properties. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2009/whc09-33com-inf8B1ADDe.pdf
ICOMOS. 2006. Evaluations of Cultural Properties.
ICOMOS. 2010. Evaluations of cultural properties. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2009/whc09-33com-inf8B1ADDe.pdf
ICOMOS. 2011. Evaluations of cultural properties.
ICOMOS. 2012. Evaluations of Nominations of Cultural and Mixed Properties. https://whc.unesco.org/en/documents/167857
ICOMOS. 2013. Evaluations of Nominations of Cultural and Mixed Properties.https://whc.unesco.org/en/documents/167857
ICOMOS. 2014. Evaluations of Nominations of Cultural and Mixed Properties.
ICOMOS. 2015. Evaluations of Nominations of Cultural and Mixed Properties.
ICOMOS. 2016. Evaluations of Nominations of Cultural and Mixed Properties.
ICOMOS. 2017. Evaluations of Nominations of Cultural and Mixed Properties.
ICOMOS. 2018. Evaluations of Nominations of Cultural and Mixed Properties.
ICOMOS. 2021. Evaluations of Nominations of Cultural and Mixed Properties 2020-2021.
ICOMOS. 2023. Evaluations of Nominations of Cultural and Mixed Properties 2022-2023.
ICOMOS World Heritage Panel sessions 2020-2021 . (n.d.). Retrieved October 1, 2023, from https://www.icomos.org/en/home-wh/93286-icomos-world-heritage-panel-2019-2022
IUCN. 2011. IUCN Evaluation of Nominations of Natural and Mixed Properties to the World Heritage List.
IUCN. 2016. IUCN World Heritage Evaluations 2016 IUCN Evaluations of Nominations of Natural and Mixed. July, 10–20.
IUCN. 2018. IUCN World Heritage Evaluations 2018 IUCN Evaluations of Nominations of Natural and Mixed. July, 10–20.
IUCN. 2019. IUCN World Heritage Evaluations 2019 IUCN Evaluations of Nominations of Natural and Mixed. July, 10–20.
Jokilehto, J. 2011. World heritage: Observations on decisions related to cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development1(1): 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/20441261111129942
Thorsell, J., andR Hogan. 2014. IUCN Evaluation World Heritage Nominations.
UNESCO. 1972. Convention Concerning The Protection of The World Cultural and Natural Heritage. In UNESCO (Issue november).
UNESCO. 2011. Preparing World Heritage Nomination.
UNESCO World Heritage Centre. 2019. Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention (Issue July). http://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide08-en.pdf
Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies
Volume 12, Issue 23
September 2023
Pages 95-116

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics